Category Archives: Economic policy

Riggs Bank, Personal Banker to US Presidents, International Diplomats and Dubiously Moneyed Dictators

What was to evolve into Riggs National Bank started its commercial existence as a small brokerage business in Washington DC, founded by William Wilson Corcoran in 1836. Four years later Corcoran partnered with George Washington Riggs whose family took control of the bank after Corcoran retired. Riggs Bank was prominent in US affairs from the 1840s onwards, bankrolling several of the federal government’s gigantic territorial acquisitions in the 19th Century as the US expanded westwards, southwards, northwards…>$US16 M to fight the Mexican-American War, $US7.2 M for the purchase of Alaska. The bank famously established a relationship with the incumbent in the White House…at least 20 US presidents and their families held accounts with the bank. Banks are not adverse to indulging in hyperbole and in its erstwhile vain glory Riggs was no exception, being fond of describing itself as “the most important bank in the most important city in the world”.

Riggs Bank managed to get the image of its HQ onto the US ten dollar note at one time (circled in red, at the rear of the US Treasury)

Riggs Bank’s “glamorous” but risky business model: In the 20th century Riggs Bank gained the reputation of being the “diplomat’s bank” (or the “embassies’ bank”), due to its tendency to court the personal business of diplomatic staff and foreign potentates from all around the world…at one point 95% of the foreign embassies in Washington DC banked with Riggs. The obsession with securing embassy business proved an expensive undertaking which returned little profit, and was a factor in the banking corporation’s eventual undoing (‘Riggs Bank’, Elliot Carter, Atlas Obscura, 15-Dec-2016, www.atlas.obscura.com).

Riggs Bank, early cheque

Three scandals: This preoccupation with foreign VIP customers helped to sow the seeds of Riggs Banks’ ultimate downfall. Its cosy dealings with embassies particularly that of Saudi Arabia brought the bank’s disreputable practices to light. The boys at RB were guilty, indefensibly so, of failing in its duty to report the Saudi embassy’s suspicious transactions of hundreds of millions of dollars. Riggs’ lax controls also (unknowingly) enabled the Middle East hijackers responsible for the 9/11 attacks on the Twin Towers to transfer money through its bank (‘Riggs Bank – A History of Compliance Failures’, Chris Hamblin, Wealth Briefing, 14-Feb-2005, www.wealthbriefing.com).

Riggs National Bank (image: “Riggs National Bank,” DC Historic Sites, accessed June 1, 2025, https://historicsites.dcpreservation.org/items/show/509.)

Cornering the pariah banking market: A second international scandal involved Riggs and the controversial Chilean general and dictator Augusto Pinochet. Fawning bank officials visited Senator Pinochet and invited him to open an account with Riggs. Pinochet proceeded to open more than 125 accounts, many under false names (not just with Riggs but also with Citigroup, Bank of America, etc). Riggs Bank and Citigroup helped the reviled dictator set up offshore holding companies from where the money (US$15 M) could be secretly transferred to personal (ie, Pinochet family) accounts in the US and elsewhere. Riggs Bank’s action was in violation of international court rulings freezing the assets of the former dictator, who was facing charges of corruption, tax evasion and illegal arms sales, not to mention, human rights violations against the Chilean people.

Pinochet’s “mug shot” (source: National Security Archive)

RB’s sticky fingers on more dirty money: The third of the bank’s scandals at this time followed similar lines to the Pinochet imbroglio. In 1995 newly oil-rich Equatorial Guinea opened its first account at Riggs. Eventually, it would become the bank’s biggest depositor…at its peak, under an obliging George W Bush administration, the EG accounts would total US$700 M, much of it in the private accounts of tyrannical President Obiang, his family and senior government officials. Again, off-shore shell companies were created in Obiang family’s names, reportedly with the assistance of Riggs. The US Senate in 2004 found that Riggs had serviced the tiny West African country’s accounts “with little or no attention to its anti-money laundering obligations”. The bank vice president responsible for the Equatorial Guinea accounts was sacked and faced federal embezzlement charges (‘Reputation Damage: The Price Riggs Paid’, World Check, (2008), www.world-check.com).

Obiang’s Equatorial Guinea: rich in oil, poor in democracy and human rights
(source: Getty Images | 2019 Anadolu Agency)

Fallout and repercussions: Found culpable for various breaches of financial propriety including its complicity in money laundering schemes with foreign clients, Riggs initially agreed to pay US$41 M in fines to the US government, plus US$9 M to go towards the Chilean victims of the Pinochet regime.These crippling financial penalties helped tip the weakened Riggs Bank over the edge of no return. In 2005, faced with the twin burdens of having to fork out a grand total of US$59 M in fines and settlements and the threat of relentless regulatory remediation, the bank was swiftly swallowed up in a merger with the PNC Financial Services Group (‘Canadian banks need a history lesson on the perils of money laundering in the United States’, Rita Trichur, The Globe and Mail, 29-Aug-2024, www.theglobeandmail.com). After nearly 169 years of banking in the deep end, Riggs Bank, once a American cultural institution, was unceremoniously but justly turfed into the dustbin of financial history.

Endnote: The CIA/Riggs Bank/Saudi nexus Riggs Bank in the 1980s even established a grubby, secret relationship with the CIA. The CIA co-opted the ever-obliging bank in a covert operation whereby the ubiquitous spy agency used the Saudi royal family’s accounts at Riggs to provide funds for the Nicaraguan Contra rebels and the Afghan Mujahideen in their war against the Soviet Union (Carter).

The PNC Bank name emblazoned on the former Riggs Bank headquarters on Pennsylvania Avenue

⓵ starting with Martin Van Buren, president 1837–1841, through to (appropriately) Richard Nixon, 1969–74

⓶ Riggs Bank during the period of the scandals was owned by the Allbritton family whose scion (Joe Allbritton) was good friends with George W Bush and the Bush family

Common Prosperity Redux: Socialism “with Chinese Characteristics” Xi-Style

Deng prosperity (Wikiwand)

The latest buzz phrases in economic policy in PRC under Xi Jinping are “common prosperity” and “dual circulation” (see Postscript). Actually, common prosperity (Gongtong fuyu) is not new at all to communist China, there has had two previous iterations, the expression originating with Chairman Mao as far back as 1953. Then in the late 1970s leader Deng Xiaoping co-opted the term, flipping it to help spearhead an economic reorientation from the ideologically adherent socialism of Mao to an opening towards market capitalism and private enterprise. Deng proposed a different route to common prosperity, one that allowed some peasants to get rich, which would provide the catalyst to drag the others towards the stated objective.

(Source: addicted2success.com)

First generation billionaires and millionaires; social cohesion imperilled
Beijing tell us the purpose of the Xi-led common prosperity initiative is to reverse the growing trend of the wealth gap which has dramatically increased since Deng’s day. China’s rapid economic growth made it possible to lift millions of Chinese out of poverty, but has also led to a situation where the top 1% holding 30.6% of the country’s wealth. Estimates put the number of Chinese (USD) billionaires as high as 1.1 million (second to the US) (East Asia Forum 20-Sep-2021). According to Elizabeth Economy, China’s Gini coefficient ranks it in the camp of the world’s most unequal states (quoted in Andrew Collier, ’China’s ‘Common Prosperity Campaign Is Going to Be Tough’, The Diplomat, 18-Sep-2021, www.thediplomat.com). Many middle class Chinese citizens are flaunting thbeir nouvelles richesses with luxury acquisitions, which doesn’t go unnoticed by those lower down the socio-economic strata.

Xi in Mao’s shadow? (Photo: denverpost.com)

A pivot to the left?
The Asia Society’s Kevin Rudd described common prosperity as a strategy to re-establish the prominence of the state and the party over the market. Many China-watchers don’t necessarily attribute the new move by the Xi government to the communist party having suddenly rediscovered its 1949 socialist roots. With the situation calling for change, Xi is acting also with an eye to bolstering up his leadership and legitimacy to secure a third term as president next year.

Jack Ma (Source: las2orillas.co)

Cracking down on Alibaba and Tencent
Xi and the party looked round for targets, pressure has been exerted on China’s high profile business elite, mega-billionaires such as Jack Ma and Pony Ma. In genuflect-like fashion their respective companies Alibaba and Tencent quickly came forward to pledge billions of dollars to charities (‘Chinese tech giants pledge billions to support President Xi Jinping’s ‘ common prosperity goal’, Dong Xing, ABC News, 07-Sep-2021, www.abc.net.au). Others to find themselves in the cross-hairs of the new reform agenda include private tutoring, online gaming and the entertainment industry. Critics say that leaning on big tech companies and taxing high and ‘unreasonable’ incomes won’t fix China’s structural inequality in income. What is required is a fundamental change in tax structure and state system which addresses the core problem of a lack of tax revenue. China’s share of revenue is 28.% of GDP cf. 40.3% for OECD countries, its personal income taxes loiter at just 1.2% of GDP cf. the OECD’s 8.2%. PRC’s “Achilles Heel” in tax is the paucity of its compliance, the present system results in a low number of personal tax payers in China relative to workforce size (Collier).

(Source: Brunswick Group)

No “Robin Hood” scenario at work
The Chinese government has moved quickly to reassure concerned business heavyweights (and international investors) about its motives…senior economic official Han Wenxiu’s pitch: common prosperity was “not about killing the rich to help the poor”, rather, he said, it is geared to “doing a proper job of expanding the pie and dividing the pie” (‘Assessing China’s “common prosperity” campaign’, Ryan Haas, Brookings, 09-Sep-2021, www.brookings.edu).

The outcome of such a transformation as the reforms may bring about, some fear may be a “top down Utopian China” with, as K Rudd suggested earlier, even more power and control devolving to the party (‘Changing China: How Xi’s ‘common prosperity’ may impact the world’, Kaishma Vaswani, BBC News, 07-Oct-2021, www.bbc.com).

Little appetite for property and inheritance taxes
One source of redistributing wealth on a national level is taxation on property and inheritance (and a more progressive income tax). But there appears little enthusiasm to upturn this apple cart as it steps uncomfortably on the toes of communist party elites and their vested interests (Haas).

t Image: radiichina.com

Endnote: Millennial “have-nots“, in dire need of a share of the common prosperity
The effects of the free market’s dislocation of Chinese society in the early 21st century falls heaviest on the young. Young Chinese face enormous pressures on the highly competitive road to success, starting with the pressure cooker of trying to excel in the gaokao (higher education entrance exam). Even with tertiary qualifications under their belt, so many find themselves chasing the same plum jobs. with nine million-a-year university graduates, with the exception of a fortunate few “a whole generation” miss out on the Chinese good life promised by the capitalist success story (‘China’s ‘common prosperity’ goal won’t mean Robin Hood style redistribution’, Andrew Leung, South China Morning Post, 23–Sep-2021, www.scmp.com). Signs of growing millennial dissatisfaction with the uber-demanding drudgery of the “996” work culture in large Chinese companies manifest themselves—largely via Weibo the Chinese social media network—in the “lying flat” movement (píng tâng) … more twenty-somethings and thirty-somethings opting to drop-out of the competitive rat race, thus earning the state‘s opprobrium (‘The buzzwords reflecting the frustration of China’s young generation’, Fan Wang & Yitsing Wang, BBC, 14-Jun-2021, www.bbc.com). Then there’s the elusive dream of home ownership, wealthy property investors and speculators have pushed the cost of owning a home out of the reach of many millennials…squeezed out of the property market, feeling burn-out from “996”, more young Chinese are forgoing (or at least postponing) starting a family.

(Photo.thestar.com.my)

Postscript: A new economic model to narrow the income gap
“Dual circulation” dovetails neatly into the objective of common prosperity. Beijing has signalled its intent to re-gig the economic model, moving away from over-dependence on exports and capital investment favouring large enterprises, and tapping into the potential of its huge domestic market. This could lead to a refocus on services, domestic consumption and the environment, and a reliance on “indigenous innovation to fuel growth” (Leung; ‘What is China’s dual circulation economic strategy and why is it important?’, Frank Tang, South China Morning Post, 19-Nov-2020, www.scmp.com).

𝄪 𝄪 𝄪 𝄪 𝄪 𝄪 𝄪 𝄪 𝄪 𝄪 𝄪 𝄪 𝄪 𝄪 𝄪 𝄪

conversely some 600 million workers live on the equivalent of US$154 or less a month (East Asia Forum)

9am to 9pm, 6 days a week